You may also like
Spurious Shield: “Pre Existing Dispute” under section 8(2) (a) as a tool to delay CIRP by the Corporate Debtor – By Radhika Baderia & Aditya Pratap Singh
High Court had correctly applied a prima facie review to determine the genuineness of the dispute, highlighting Goqii's strategic attempt to avoid payment by raising baseless allegations only after receiving a demand...
Glas Trust Company LLC v Byju Raveendran: Reaffirming Collective Interest Principle in IBC Settlements – By Preeti Thakur
Glas Trust Company LLC v Byju Raveendran: Reaffirming Collective Interest Principle in IBC Settlements Preeti Thakur Second Year LL.B. (Hons.), National Law School , Bengaluru Introduction The Insolvency and Bankruptcy...
Digital Disruption and Debt Resolution: A New Paradigm –
Digital Disruption and Debt Resolution: A New Paradigm Shivangi Gupta 5th Year BA. LL.B.(Corporate Law Hons.), School of Law, UPES, Dehradun Introduction “AI is present to provide a facilitative tool to judges in order...
Creditor in Control vs. Debtor in Possession – An Evaluation and Exploration of their Efficiency – By Sudhanva Bharadwaj
Creditor in Control vs. Debtor in Possession – An Evaluation and Exploration of their Efficiency Sudhanva Bharadwaj 4th year law student, B.A. LL.B. (Hons.), Jindal Global Law School Abstract The debate...
Significance of issuing Notice under Sections 10, 31, 33, 94, 99 and 112 of IBC – By Simarpreet Kaur Chabbra
Significance of issuing notice under Sections 10, 31, 33, 94, 99 and 112 of IBC Simarpreet Kaur Chabbra[1] LRA NCLT Bengaluru Bench Abstract According to the landmark decision of the Hon’ble NCLAT in Go Air Airlines...
Case Analysis of Judgement of Noida Power Company Limited v Mr. Gaurav Katiyar RP of Earthcon Universal Infractech Pvt. Ltd. – By Adv. Sahil Arora
Case Analysis of Judgement of Noida Power Company Limited v Mr. Gaurav Katiyar RP of Earthcon Universal Infractech Pvt. Ltd.1 Adv. Sahil Arora Advocate, Delhi High Court Brief Background of Appeals Appellants filed...